Live Not By Lies

Live Not by Lies

taken from: https://www.solzhenitsyncenter.org/live-not-by-lies

On the day Solzhenitsyn was arrested, February, 12, 1974, he released the text of “Live Not by Lies.” The next day, he was exiled to the West, where he received a hero’s welcome. This moment marks the peak of his fame. Solzhenitsyn equates “lies” with ideology, the illusion that human nature and society can be reshaped to predetermined specifications. And his last word before leaving his homeland urges Soviet citizens as individuals to refrain from cooperating with the regime’s lies. Even the most timid can take this least demanding step toward spiritual independence. If many march together on this path of passive resistance, the whole inhuman system will totter and collapse.

by Edward E. Ericson, Jr. and Daniel J. Mahoney, The Solzhenitsyn Reader


There was a time when we dared not rustle a whisper. But now we write and read samizdat and, congregating in the smoking rooms of research institutes, heartily complain to each other of all they are muddling up, of all they are dragging us into! There’s that unnecessary bravado around our ventures into space, against the backdrop of ruin and poverty at home; and the buttressing of distant savage regimes; and the kindling of civil wars; and the ill-thought-out cultivation of Mao Zedong (at our expense to boot)—in the end we’ll be the ones sent out against him, and we’ll have to go, what other option will there be? And they put whomever they want on trial, and brand the healthy as mentally ill—and it is always “they,” while we are—helpless.

We are approaching the brink; already a universal spiritual demise is upon us; a physical one is about to flare up and engulf us and our children, while we continue to smile sheepishly and babble:

“But what can we do to stop it? We haven’t the strength.”

We have so hopelessly ceded our humanity that for the modest handouts of today we are ready to surrender up all principles, our soul, all the labors of our ancestors, all the prospects of our descendants—anything to avoid disrupting our meager existence. We have lost our strength, our pride, our passion. We do not even fear a common nuclear death, do not fear a third world war (perhaps we’ll hide away in some crevice), but fear only to take a civic stance! We hope only not to stray from the herd, not to set out on our own, and risk suddenly having to make do without the white bread, the hot water heater, a Moscow residency permit.

We have internalized well the lessons drummed into us by the state; we are forever content and comfortable with its premise: we cannot escape the environment, the social conditions; they shape us, “being determines consciousness.” What have we to do with this? We can do nothing.

But we can do—everything!—even if we comfort and lie to ourselves that this is not so. It is not “they” who are guilty of everything, but we ourselves, only we!

Some will counter: But really, there is nothing to be done! Our mouths are gagged, no one listens to us, no one asks us. How can we make them listen to us?

To make them reconsider—is impossible.

The natural thing would be simply not to reelect them, but there are no re-elections in our country.

In the West they have strikes, protest marches, but we are too cowed, too scared: How does one just give up one’s job, just go out onto the street?

All the other fateful means resorted to over the last century of Russia’s bitter history are even less fitting for us today—true, let’s not fall back on them! Today, when all the axes have hewn what they hacked, when all that was sown has borne fruit, we can see how lost, how drugged were those conceited youths who sought, through terror, bloody uprising, and civil war, to make the country just and content. No thank you, fathers of enlightenment! We now know that the vileness of the means begets the vileness of the result. Let our hands be clean!

So has the circle closed? So is there indeed no way out? So the only thing left to do is wait inertly: What if something just happens by itself?

But it will never come unstuck by itself, if we all, every day, continue to acknowledge, glorify, and strengthen it, if we do not, at the least, recoil from its most vulnerable point.

From lies.

When violence bursts onto the peaceful human condition, its face is flush with self-assurance, it displays on its banner and proclaims: “I am Violence! Make way, step aside, I will crush you!” But violence ages swiftly, a few years pass—and it is no longer sure of itself. To prop itself up, to appear decent, it will without fail call forth its ally—Lies. For violence has nothing to cover itself with but lies, and lies can only persist through violence. And it is not every day and not on every shoulder that violence brings down its heavy hand: It demands of us only a submission to lies, a daily participation in deceit—and this suffices as our fealty.

And therein we find, neglected by us, the simplest, the most accessible key to our liberation: a personal nonparticipation in lies! Even if all is covered by lies, even if all is under their rule, let us resist in the smallest way: Let their rule hold not through me!

And this is the way to break out of the imaginary encirclement of our inertness, the easiest way for us and the most devastating for the lies. For when people renounce lies, lies simply cease to exist. Like parasites, they can only survive when attached to a person.

We are not called upon to step out onto the square and shout out the truth, to say out loud what we think—this is scary, we are not ready. But let us at least refuse to say what we do not think!

This is the way, then, the easiest and most accessible for us given our deep-seated organic cowardice, much easier than (it’s scary even to utter the words) civil disobedience à la Gandhi.

Our way must be: Never knowingly support lies! Having understood where the lies begin (and many see this line differently)—step back from that gangrenous edge! Let us not glue back the flaking scales of the Ideology, not gather back its crumbling bones, nor patch together its decomposing garb, and we will be amazed how swiftly and helplessly the lies will fall away, and that which is destined to be naked will be exposed as such to the world.

And thus, overcoming our temerity, let each man choose: Will he remain a witting servant of the lies (needless to say, not due to natural predisposition, but in order to provide a living for the family, to rear the children in the spirit of lies!), or has the time come for him to stand straight as an honest man, worthy of the respect of his children and contemporaries? And from that day onward he:

· Will not write, sign, nor publish in any way, a single line distorting, so far as he can see, the truth;

· Will not utter such a line in private or in public conversation, nor read it from a crib sheet, nor speak it in the role of educator, canvasser, teacher, actor;

· Will not in painting, sculpture, photograph, technology, or music depict, support, or broadcast a single false thought, a single distortion of the truth as he discerns it;

· Will not cite in writing or in speech a single “guiding” quote for gratification, insurance, for his success at work, unless he fully shares the cited thought and believes that it fits the context precisely;

· Will not be forced to a demonstration or a rally if it runs counter to his desire and his will; will not take up and raise a banner or slogan in which he does not fully believe;

· Will not raise a hand in vote for a proposal which he does not sincerely support; will not vote openly or in secret ballot for a candidate whom he deems dubious or unworthy;

· Will not be impelled to a meeting where a forced and distorted discussion is expected to take place;

· Will at once walk out from a session, meeting, lecture, play, or film as soon as he hears the speaker utter a lie, ideological drivel, or shameless propaganda;

· Will not subscribe to, nor buy in retail, a newspaper or journal that distorts or hides the underlying facts.

This is by no means an exhaustive list of the possible and necessary ways of evading lies. But he who begins to cleanse himself will, with a cleansed eye, easily discern yet other opportunities.

Yes, at first it will not be fair. Someone will have to temporarily lose his job. For the young who seek to live by truth, this will at first severely complicate life, for their tests and quizzes, too, are stuffed with lies, and so choices will have to be made. But there is no loophole left for anyone who seeks to be honest: Not even for a day, not even in the safest technical occupations can he avoid even a single one of the listed choices—to be made in favor of either truth or lies, in favor of spiritual independence or spiritual servility. And as for him who lacks the courage to defend even his own soul: Let him not brag of his progressive views, boast of his status as an academician or a recognized artist, a distinguished citizen or general. Let him say to himself plainly: I am cattle, I am a coward, I seek only warmth and to eat my fill.

For us, who have grown staid over time, even this most moderate path of resistance will be not be easy to set out upon. But how much easier it is than self-immolation or even a hunger strike: Flames will not engulf your body, your eyes will not pop out from the heat, and your family will always have at least a piece of black bread to wash down with a glass of clear water.

Betrayed and deceived by us, did not a great European people—the Czechoslovaks—show us how one can stand down the tanks with bared chest alone, as long as inside it beats a worthy heart?

It will not be an easy path, perhaps, but it is the easiest among those that lie before us. Not an easy choice for the body, but the only one for the soul. No, not an easy path, but then we already have among us people, dozens even, who have for years abided by all these rules, who live by the truth.

And so: We need not be the first to set out on this path, Ours is but to join! The more of us set out together, the thicker our ranks, the easier and shorter will this path be for us all! If we become thousands—they will not cope, they will be unable to touch us. If we will grow to tens of thousands—we will not recognize our country!

But if we shrink away, then let us cease complaining that someone does not let us draw breath—we do it to ourselves! Let us then cower and hunker down, while our comrades the biologists bring closer the day when our thoughts can be read and our genes altered.

And if from this also we shrink away, then we are worthless, hopeless, and it is of us that Pushkin asks with scorn:

Why offer herds their liberation? 
…………………
Their heritage each generation
The yoke with jingles, and the whip.

February 12, 1974

———————————————-

If you would like to communicate further about this or any other issues, please email me at jimshaul@gmail.com and we can chat. We can also chat on Messenger once I know who you are.

If you would like to read more of my thoughts, please visit my blog: https://jimshaul.org and follow me there. You can also find me on Substack at MrJimShaul.

If you appreciate my posts, please consider Liking them and Sharing them below if you think they could be a blessing to others.

For His Glory,

Jim

Posted in Critical Reasoning, Politics, Values/Ethics | Leave a comment

Cattle Prod

Just so’s ya know: I post things to make people think. I do not have the power to change what they think, but posing questions, making provocative claims, and providing solid sources can result in people rummaging through their minds to figure out why they think what they think.

I also post things to prod people to speak. The world desperately needs truth to be declared and lies to be confronted and dispelled. The world needs many, many voices to do this. The world needs YOUR voice. You don’t need to be the smartest and most educated person on the block. You just need to know what the truth is and try to articulate it carefully. Please make a difference in our world. Please step up to the plate and defend truth. As Alexander Solzhenitsyn said, “We live not by lies.”

Be kind. Be respectful. Be firm. Be noisy. If you love this country, be gently noisy and deliver truth to your generation.

This message is sponsored by… no one. This message is needed by everyone. Go out and Moo!

———————————————-

If you would like to communicate further about this or any other issues, please email me at jimshaul@gmail.com and we can chat. We can also chat on Messenger once I know who you are.

If you would like to read more of my thoughts, please visit my blog: https://jimshaul.org and follow me there. You can also find me on Substack at MrJimShaul.

If you appreciate my posts, please consider Liking them and Sharing them below if you think they could be a blessing to others.

For His Glory,

Jim

Posted in Critical Reasoning, Ethics | Leave a comment

The Moral Justification for Abortion

Picture a maze with one exit… and that exit has something positive waiting outside the exit (like ice cream). Picture the same maze with several entrances – all of which will lead you to the exit.

That is what it is like arguing abortion. Each side has their own maze.

Those who are “pro-life” have at their exit door a live baby. Many different arguments can get them to that conclusion, but the end goal is always the same. The end goal is the protection and preservation of a “value” that they find precious.

Those who are “pro-choice” have at the exit door a person (man or woman) who wants (for themselves or others) to be able to engage in sexual activity with whomever they choose whenever they choose and do not want to pay the price of having a baby as a consequence.

When these two sides argue, it really doesn’t matter much where you start – what entrance you take. Each entrance will get them to the end they want. You can enter through the door of the constitution, laws, freedom, humanity, person-hood, viability, life, and etc. – what matters is the getting to the goal.

So let’s at least acknowledge the reality that the turns and contortions of the arguments really don’t matter – as long as they get to the goal they want and protect the value they hold dear.

Think deeply about this and let me know if you agree or disagree. Think deeply about this and ask yourself about the “morality” or “value” of the goals.

———————————————-

If you would like to communicate further about this or any other issues, please email me at jimshaul@gmail.com and we can chat. We can also chat on Messenger once I know who you are.

If you would like to read more of my thoughts, please visit my blog: https://jimshaul.org and follow me there. You can also find me on Substack at MrJimShaul.

If you appreciate my posts, please consider Liking them and Sharing them below if you think they could be a blessing to others.

For His Glory,

Jim

Posted in Critical Reasoning, Ethics | Leave a comment

Job Description

A Christian Job Description

We are therefore Christ’s ambassadors, as though God were making his appeal through us. We implore you on Christ’s behalf: Be reconciled to God. 21 God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. (II Cor. 5:20-21)

  1. Be faithful Ambassadors
  2. Implore others to be reconciled to God based on Christ’s propitiation for our sins.

Get to it! I would be happy to assist!

———————————————-

If you would like to communicate further about this or any other issues, please email me at jimshaul@gmail.com and we can chat. We can also chat on Messenger once I know who you are.

If you would like to read more of my thoughts, please visit my blog: https://jimshaul.org and follow me there. You can also find me on Substack at MrJimShaul.

If you appreciate my posts, please consider Liking them and Sharing them below if you think they could be a blessing to others.

For His Glory,

Jim

Posted in Christianity | Leave a comment

Signs That Trouble is a Comin’

One of the most poignant and easy to spot signs that there is a totalitarian agenda in your midst is attempts by individuals or groups to shut down free speech – and that includes using the all too slippery and unconstitutional claim that they are against hate speech (which is always defined by them and has been ruled by the courts as protected speech). It also happens when people find ways to cut you off media or cancel your platform. This is speech bullying and nothing less.

Read what Izzy Kalman said in his article in Psychology Today, “We need to be allowed to say what we want, as long as our words don’t cause tangible harm to people’s bodies or property, or society will stagnate and we will be prisoners in our own skulls, only permitted to say things that the authorities approve of. Without Freedom of Speech, we would never solve problems that require the abandonment of current ways of thinking. Without Freedom of Speech, the government could be as despotic as it wishes, killing off any protestors without impunity. Where the concept of Freedom of Speech is absent, people believe they are entitled to kill others who say things they find offensive. Without Freedom of Speech, we would literally be living in the Dark Ages.” https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/resilience-bullying/200907/the-death-freedom-speech-and-the-growth-intolerance

I don’t care what side of the aisle you are on, you should be very concerned when you see this muzzling happening around you. Call it out for what it is and fear it for where it can take us!

———————————————-

If you would like to communicate further about this or any other issues, please email me at jimshaul@gmail.com and we can chat. We can also chat on Messenger once I know who you are.

If you would like to read more of my thoughts, please visit my blog: https://jimshaul.org and follow me there. You can also find me on Substack at MrJimShaul.

If you appreciate my posts, please consider Liking them and Sharing them below if you think they could be a blessing to others.

For His Glory,

Jim

Posted in Ethics, Politics, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Y’all Settle Down Now

Just to be as clear as a pint glass:

1) I ain’t mad at nobody
2) I don’t wish nobody any harm
3) I wanna hear from anybody who wants to talk on anything who is committed to respectful talking
4) If you don’t like what I say, feel free to a) set me straight or ) don’t listen to what I say
5) Even though I had to spell this all out for ya, I still ain’t mad at nobody

———————————————-
If you would like to communicate further about this or any other issues, please email me at jimshaul@gmail.com and we can chat. We can also chat on Messenger once I know who you are.
If you would like to read more of my thoughts, please visit my blog: https://jimshaul.org and follow me there. You can also find me on Substack at MrJimShaul.
If you appreciate my posts, please consider Liking them and Sharing them below if you think they could be a blessing to others.
For His Glory,
Jim

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

For Those Not Ready to Abort

For Those Who Are Not Ready to Go the Abortion Route

Crisis Pregnancy Centers

The crisis pregnancy center locator identifies 2,525 crisis pregnancy centers in the United States; that’s an average of more than 50 per state, so chances are, there is a crisis pregnancy center within accessible distance from you. The site even lists the crisis pregnancy center in my small town, if that makes any difference in credibility to you.

Many crisis pregnancy centers solicit donations from their communities, but they are also subsidized by state and federal tax dollars. For example, in 2018, Care Net received a substantial grant from the United States government to help finance its operations across the country. Because each crisis pregnancy center likely receives tax-payer money, there are rules about how much care a center can provide to each patron and how frequently you may attend.

In a study published in March of 2020, the University of California San Francisco associate professor Katrina Kimport found that most of the women she studied had already decided against abortion before visiting a crisis pregnancy center. If you are not interested in terminating your pregnancy, then a crisis pregnancy center could prove a useful tool as you prepare for your next steps.

Taken from: https://adoption.org/crisis-pregnancy-center

The Adoption Option

There are no national statistics on how many people are waiting to adopt, but experts estimate it is somewhere between one and two million couples. Every year there are about 1.3 million abortions. Only 4% of women with unwanted pregnancies place their children through adoption.

Taken from: https://adoptionnetwork.com/adoption-myths-facts/domestic-us-statistics/

What Resources are Available

Being a single mother can be hard on the finances. The government does understand the different situations that a single mom can find herself in. Fortunately, you can find government help for single mothers!  There are thousands of state and federal programs out there.

These programs can help with housing, child care, scholarships and tuition for college, job placement, overdue bills and even with credit card debt. However, where do you find these programs and how do you apply for them?

See the following website for a list of resources:

How To Get Government Help & Assistance As A Single Mom

Crisis Pregnancy Outreach

Thousands of women have stood in your shoes, not knowing where to turn or what to do. You may feel confused and alone. But you don’t have to. We’re here to help, both physically and emotionally. Our services and support are free and confidential. More importantly, they’re provided by a caring staff of volunteers with a heart for you and your baby.

https://www.crisispregnancyoutreach.org/

———————————————-

If you would like to communicate further about this or any other issues, please email me at jimshaul@gmail.com and we can chat. We can also chat on Messenger once I know who you are.

If you would like to read more of my thoughts, please visit my blog: https://jimshaul.org and follow me there. You can also find me on substack at MrJimShaul.

If you appreciate my posts, please consider Liking them and Sharing them below if you think they could be a blessing to others.

For His Glory,

Jim

Posted in Family | Leave a comment

Miracle Bodies

Miracle Bodies

Webster defines a body as:

1a) the main part of a plant or animal body especially as distinguished from limbs and head

2a) the organized physical substance of an animal or plant either living or dead

The first definition is focused on the distinction between the main portion of a body (trunk, thorax, and etc,) as distinct from the extremities (arms, legs, tail, or even head) the second definition focuses on the distinction between the entire being of an animal or plant as distinct from its surroundings.

All plants and animals have bodies by either definition.

When a head pops out from a mother’s birth canal, it is clear that this is a different and separate head from Mom’s. No one in the room thinks it is mom’s head coming out of her body. Then comes the neck and shoulders and finally the arms, trunk, and legs of the baby. Everyone in the room knows that this is not mom’s body. Everyone. No one thinks a miracle just occurred and out of nothing – poof a body just appears, never having existed before.

But lets back up a bit.

Before the head came out – while it was still in the birth canal, was it a head? Were there arms and legs and stuff attached below? Yupper, there were…. And it was not mom’s head, nor her trunk, nor her arms and legs. They all belonged to that thing inside her. For the moment, let’s avoid calling this thing with a separate head, trunk, legs, and arms – a body – a specific term. Let’s call it Thing X. While its in the birth canal, Thing X has an organized physical substance – which above is the definition of a body. Thing X has a body. No one can reasonably deny this. Thing X’s body does not just suddenly pop into existence as it leaves the birth canal like it never existed before. It pre-existed birth. No one can reasonably deny this. Mom also has a body – an organized physical substance. Her body is her body. No one can reasonably deny that either. There are two bodies after birth occurs and there were two bodies before birth occurred. To deny this would be metaphysical or semantic folly.

Go back several weeks – even several months, and we find that Thing X has a body back then. Go all the way back to seven weeks after conception. What do we find then?

Even though it is only in its second month, Thing X’s body is already forming every organ it will need — including the heart, kidneys, liver, lungs, and intestines. It has arms already. Buds are sprouting from Thing X’s growing arms. Right now they look like paddles, but eventually they’ll form hands and feet. Your baby is attached to mom’s body by an umbilical cord. Through this connection, Mom’s body will provide food, and filter away Thing X’s wastes until it exits through the birth canal and the umbilical cord is cut. Thing X’s body is performing cellular processes called metabolism (taking in energy, using it for cell operations and then expelling waste products of those processes) and is growing. This is what is known as life,

So, the real question is, when did Thing X first have its own body? At birth? In the birth canal? At seven weeks after conception? At conception? Of course all this is debatable, but what must be taken into account when debating is that Thing X has human DNA (and is therefore “human”) code in every cell that is different from mom’s human DNA and is completely unique. In many cases it will have a different blood type. In half the cases it will be a different sex from mom.

In every case, however, it has a different body. It is a body within a body – at least from some point in time forward. This is scientifically and semantically undeniable. What is present at birth is a living human with a separate body from moms. What is present at 7 weeks? The same Thing. Some call this a miracle.

What are the ramifications of this? You tell me.

———————————————-

If you would like to communicate further about this or any other issues, please email me at jimshaul@gmail.com and we can chat. We can also chat on Messenger once I know who you are.

If you would like to read more of my thoughts, please visit my blog: https://jimshaul.org and follow me there. You can also find me on Substack at MrJimShaul.

If you appreciate my posts, please consider Liking them and Sharing them below if you think they could be a blessing to others.

For His Glory,

Jim

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Originalism Part I

———————————————-

Originalism is in its simplest terms, reading a text, any text, looking for and sticking to the meaning that the writer had in her/his head when it was originally written. Pretty simple idea, actually. When applied to a way of approaching the Constitution, it has been defined as, “a legal philosophy that the words in documents and especially the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted as they were understood at the time they were written.” (Miriam Webster) No real difference from Non-constitutional originalism, really.

It seems that reading and understanding some older documents is fairly straight forward and simple. Let’s look at the “Emoluments Clause” in Article I Section 9 Clause 8 of the US Constitution.

“And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. “ What did they mean? Firstly, that is the exact question we should first ask – what did the writers mean when they wrote it? Mostly it is understandable in plain English. What are “emoluments”? While this word is not commonly used, it is a word used today to mean, “profit, salary, or fees from office or employment; compensation for services” according to Dictionary.com. If one chooses, you can do a deep dive study into the history of the word and its usage in other documents at or before Oct. 1780 to see if had alternate meaning back there.

So, what we are asking is, “what specifically were the writers of the constitution guarding against?” for a good discussion on this go to: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/emoluments_clause. The Supreme Court has never had a case before it on the question of the meaning of the emoluments clause, so we are left to speculate and defend our position. It seems safe to say that the framers of the constitution did not want elected or appointed Senators or Representatives to make money for foreign Kings or Princes, or receive money from foreign states while holding office – without consent of of Congress. But even if it seems safe to say that, the way our system works is that truly only the Supreme Court gets to say what it means. We can speculate, but only they can legally declare it so.

What if the minds of U.S. citizens changed over time and they decided that in fact it was fine that this happened. How would they make such a thing possible? Well, they could try and take a case to the Supreme Court and convince them that the original meaning of the constitution was such that it did not prevent officials from getting money this way. That would be a tough sell, but they could try. If the court rejected the argument or the case, there are two other options. They could amending the constitution in either of the two ways (it has been tried before) that are set forth in the constitution. For a good read on how that is done, see the following: https://www.thoughtco.com/how-to-amend-the-constitution-3368310.

For the rest of us, we write stuff and we read stuff and expect that others will take up the meaning that we laid down and vice versa. We should respect each other enough to attribute to them the skill of saying what they mean and saying it in a way that is understandable.

Stay tuned for Part II

———————————-

If you would like to communicate further about this or any other issues, please email me at jimshaul@gmail.com and we can chat. We can also chat on Messenger once I know who you are.

If you would like to read more of my thoughts, please visit my blog: https://jimshaul.org and follow me there.

If you appreciate my posts, please consider Liking them and Sharing them below if you think they could be a blessing to others.

For His Glory,

Jim

Posted in Critical Reasoning, Ethics, Politics | Leave a comment

The Goodness of God

 Or do you show contempt for the riches of his kindness, forbearance and patience, not realizing that God’s kindness (goodness) is intended to lead you to repentance? Romans 2:4

Although it is undeniable that Jesus and the later New Testament authors taught about a literal hell, Paul says in Romans that it is the Goodness of God that leads people to repentance.

The world needs to see the Father’s goodness lived out through our lives for folks to come to repentance. Sure we can talk about the fate of those who do not believe in the Son (John 3:36), but it is us showing God’s goodness that inches them towards the face of God.

———————————————-

If you would like to communicate further about this or any other issues, please email me at jimshaul@gmail.com and we can chat. We can also chat on Messenger once I know who you are.

If you would like to read more of my thoughts, please visit my blog: https://jimshaul.org and follow me there.

If you appreciate my posts, please consider Liking them and Sharing them below if you think they could be a blessing to others.

For His Glory,

Jim

Posted in Christianity, Relationships | Leave a comment